home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: Proposal 6
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 1994 17:27:10 +0200 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <2dfb188e@daggskim.ct.se> from "Bo Leuf" at Jun 12, 94 03:03:00 pm
- From: Annius.Groenink@cwi.nl (Annius Groenink)
- X-Face: "E3Hm]k]&:,OEP<{D2ixJf>-9[qOGLebNa0&cQyFL-a~)kTM3&&I"gFw=fJ]K%1IduGjOE`
- ZGu]&~G]QNGa7i/L!+#Xng<|+}HKYHj~5?fTInUEUh0$I1gBI7jrA!&_|e/pR1[cX:^xgJTPsrjA_9
- m8Zli[|.-u{]+c1(6C7mL*m`/_J\>.{4!:g
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- > that "select all" is much stonger and should require a shift modifier to in
- > some way protect from accidental selection, especially as some have noted that
- > ctrl-A is rather easy to hit unintentionally. I would much prefer that the
- > order was reversed:
- >
- > Ctrl-A = Deselect marked (all), i.e. "Abandon" selection
- > Shift-Ctrl-A = Select all
-
-
- OK. Now I've seen at least 5 people (including myself) who would find
- it a prudent decision to swap control A and shift control A. Isn't
- this a typical point where we should implement a voting system?
-
- (If we decide quickly, and get a majority for YES, that will cut down
- the volume in this list considerably!)
-
-